Sharing how Western philosophy rationally proves God's existence. This is a logical dialogue spanning across time and space—quite fascinating.

As a science student, I believed for a long time that logic was the only thing worth trusting. I once found Chinese philosophy regrettable—concepts like 'emptiness is form, form is emptiness' from the Heart Sutra seemed illogical. I even thought Eastern philosophy had gone astray, and that Western epistemology and ontology were the true path. Later, as my studies deepened, I discovered that logic has its limitations, and the methods of Chinese philosophy can do what logic cannot.

After the Spring Festival, I started reading Zhuangzi. Classical Chinese from the pre-Qin period is much harder to read than that from the Tang and Song dynasties onward. With the help of various commentaries and annotations, after reading for over a week, I've only finished "Free and Easy Wandering" and half of "The Adjustment of Controversies." Just this portion has already greatly benefited me, so today I'd like to share some insights.

2024 was the year I read the most, and the year I felt I grew the most. The books I read can be broadly categorized into three major topics: philosophy, finance, and some practical content. In this article, I will share some of my insights on these topics.

When we say "I made a free choice," what does that truly mean? In a universe governed by physical laws, does freedom really exist? And if the world itself has no purpose or meaning, what value do human choices have? Throughout life, we seem to move forward within three fundamental questions. This article attempts to explore these questions from scientific, philosophical, and conscious perspectives, seeking a "space for free and meaningful existence" between rationality and confusion.